MultifamilyRaleigh, NC · 12 units · Built 2023
Briarcliff Crossing: 12-unit multifamily sample, Raleigh, NC
All 12 units occupied at $322,152 annualized in-place rent, but 7.85% loss-to-lease ($27,456/yr) signals rents were locked in below current market.
- Units
- 12
- Year built
- 2023
- Asset class
- Multifamily
- Market
- Raleigh, NC
Key findings
In-Place Annual Rent
$322,152
Full 12-unit occupancy; monthly total $26,846 across unit mix ranging $1,910–$2,502/mo.
Occupancy
100% (12/12 units)
All units confirmed occupied per rent roll; no vacancy drag on current cash flow.
Loss-to-Lease
$27,456/yr (7.85%)
In-place rents trail market by $2,288/mo in aggregate; meaningful drag on stabilized NOI underwrite.
Lease Rollover Exposure
0 leases in 0–12 mo window
No rollover data populated for any bucket; inability to assess near-term burn-off of loss-to-lease is a diligence gap.
Average In-Place Rent
$2,237/unit/mo
Mean ($2,237) and median ($2,242) are tightly clustered, suggesting a relatively homogeneous unit mix.
Asset Vintage
2023 (1–2 yrs old)
New construction suggests minimal near-term capex, but also limited operating history to stress-test assumptions.
Analysis
## Rent & Occupancy
The rent roll reflects 12 occupied units generating $26,846/month ($322,152 annualized) in contractual in-place rent. The per-unit range of $1,910–$2,502/month with a mean of $2,237 and median of $2,242 suggests a tight, relatively uniform unit mix — consistent with a single-vintage, purpose-built asset. 100% occupancy on a 2023 build is expected at this stage but provides limited stress-test history.
## Loss-to-Lease
The most material underwriting consideration is the $27,456 annual loss-to-lease, representing 7.85% of market rent. At $2,288/month in aggregate, in-place rents are meaningfully below where the property could re-lease today. For a 12-unit asset, this gap is concentrated — it averages roughly $191/unit/month of embedded upside that cannot be captured until leases roll. Underwriters should not gross up to market rent without a credible rollover schedule.
## Rollover & Diligence Gap
The lease rollover buckets (0–3 months, 4–6 months, 7–12 months, 13+ months, and expired) all show zero leases assigned. This is a significant data gap: without lease expiration dates mapped to rollover windows, there is no basis to project when the $27,456 loss-to-lease begins to burn off. This should be flagged as a condition of credit — the sponsor must provide a complete lease expiration schedule before the rollover-adjusted NOI can be underwritten with confidence.
## Vintage & Capex
The 2023 construction date suggests minimal near-term capital expenditure requirements, which supports a cleaner cash flow profile in years 1–3. However, the asset has limited operating history, and stabilized expense ratios should be benchmarked against comparable Raleigh multifamily rather than accepted at face value from the sponsor's projections. Any underwrite should apply a market-derived expense load rather than relying on first-year actuals from a lease-up period.